BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- Subject: [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2015 00:04:26 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAJFsZ=pN=z49MVwdMA_1Rqy9jk7C5W2HpwNERoE88vg1gQStSQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <v1q09cqnmfpg4saensypmrdq.1443230831986@email.android.com> <560D5220.6080305@gmail.com> <CAFv2jcZAzQbTSDSKq7J6LWDaCkbjnkyvsqcrzMrb3XAGsE7-2g@mail.gmail.com> <560D6491.9070804@gmail.com> <CA+h9Qs5roAn7EE_FT90fBoo9UL4MQES0Mud40atTw9NoOuLNkw@mail.gmail.com> <560D69EA.2040700@gmail.com> <560D76BB.9080704@mattgillen.net> <560D9050.3050906@gmail.com> <201510020110.t921Anlu021166@dsl092-065-009.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net> <560DEBE2.5040206@gmail.com> <CAMdng5v3BvxyJPcLDCd779Vp4uKPbsew3KphXQ_qv4Cisb-Vmg@mail.gmail.com> <560DFFEF.6000408@gmail.com> <CAJFsZ=riNyJ6buKFqga=xhm8o_yNJtReEWPY0cAS0vEeZojoeQ@mail.gmail.com> <561299CC.6090200@gmail.com> <CAJFsZ=onALey9R4DWBVK4Lqcxz9wrdpWiM1y0d+=fDmO1wOKJw@mail.gmail.com> <5612B9F7.7070604@gmail.com> <874mh0ldi6.fsf@johnbyrnes.info> <563B780A.7030002@gmail.com> <CAMdng5uj4u5QGXV3XnkD7F878xy_ez6K=wW6xuZL9DGAGAUjSQ@mail.gmail.com> <563BAF21.1030301@gmail.com> <CAJFsZ=pN=z49MVwdMA_1Rqy9jk7C5W2HpwNERoE88vg1gQStSQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/6/2015 10:40 PM, Bill Bogstad wrote: > Given that the majority of cheap home routers do ship with GPL'ed > software (i.e. the Linux kernel), I am having a real problem > understanding this argument. Some GPL'ed code is okay whereas other > GPL'ed code is toxic? Or maybe it has something to do with code that > they change vs. simply compile? Okay, I'm going to stop guessing > now. Please explain if possible. Because you're on an unrelated tangent? The point was about the OEMs which don't open things up, not the ones which do (and yes, I realize just how incorrect I was for naming D-Link and TP-Link). -- Rich P.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- References:
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: john at johnbyrnes.info (John Byrnes)
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: mark at buttery.org (Shirley Márquez Dúlcey)
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Debian adds another systemd dependency, Busybox drops it
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Debian adds another systemd dependency, Busybox drops it
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- Index(es):
