BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Debian adds another systemd dependency, Busybox drops it
- Subject: [Discuss] Debian adds another systemd dependency, Busybox drops it
- From: smallm at SDF.ORG (Mike Small)
- Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2015 07:43:11 +0000
- In-reply-to: <CAJFsZ=pog2Vpd1WFtqN8PgnuQctw_n+N7GdzCZLvifu=b-KZNg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <5638D010.8040509@gmail.com> <CAJ=Rwfa=Y0jAveC9TKn4T=ZnMW4LxRgahCyzMjm+n4r6z7Sduw@mail.gmail.com> <563CB4B8.3080400@gmail.com> <CAJFsZ=pog2Vpd1WFtqN8PgnuQctw_n+N7GdzCZLvifu=b-KZNg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 10:47:30PM -0500, Bill Bogstad wrote: > On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Rich Pieri <richard.pieri at gmail.com> wrote: > > Tangentially, we've had genuinely unprivileged X servers for a long time. > > VNC's standalone X servers do not require root and to the best of my > > knowledge never have. Combined with DirectVNC, a Linux framebuffer VNC > > client, and you can have X without root without systemd hackery. > > True. But I think most people want X servers that take advantages of > all the graphics acceleration features in modern graphics cards. > Those X servers have in my experience usually required running them as > root. OpenBSD's privilege separated X uses acceleration though doesn't yet support as many graphics chipsets as X on Linux. E.g. Nouveau (for nvidia) hasn't made it over yet, but perhaps that will change now that someone at NetBSD is working on it. -- Mike Small smallm at sdf.org
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Debian adds another systemd dependency, Busybox drops it
- From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- [Discuss] Debian adds another systemd dependency, Busybox drops it
- References:
- [Discuss] Debian adds another systemd dependency, Busybox drops it
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Debian adds another systemd dependency, Busybox drops it
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Debian adds another systemd dependency, Busybox drops it
- From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- [Discuss] Debian adds another systemd dependency, Busybox drops it
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Debian adds another systemd dependency, Busybox drops it
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Debian adds another systemd dependency, Busybox drops it
- Index(es):