BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Stallman stubborn
- Subject: [Discuss] Stallman stubborn
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 12:26:54 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAMdng5sQT-sP9N3=8AKAPn_oiZpgqt3pzeBDkMfZvquk+YJ1OA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <mailman.38981.1447288128.2348.discuss@blu.org> <90E6B392-86C5-447A-80FD-F6858AB2F0C1@pioneer.ci.net> <20151112183838.GF23265@dragontoe.org> <CAJFsZ=pxmRHqecOsL-WTocKb4w_4=50hFcdVc4cM2-1AeUzdhQ@mail.gmail.com> <5648AF6C.9060304@gmail.com> <CAMdng5sQT-sP9N3=8AKAPn_oiZpgqt3pzeBDkMfZvquk+YJ1OA@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/15/2015 11:55 AM, Shirley M?rquez D?lcey wrote: > Those earlier compilers were free in the sense that you didn't have to > pay for them, but most were not freely distributable in the way that > GCC is. For starters, they were offered only for operating systems GCC is /not/ freely distributable. The GPL places a number of requirements on how software is distributed. -- Rich P.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Stallman stubborn
- From: rlk at alum.mit.edu (Robert Krawitz)
- [Discuss] Stallman stubborn
- References:
- [Discuss] Stallman stubborn
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] Stallman stubborn
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] Stallman stubborn
- From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- [Discuss] Stallman stubborn
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Stallman stubborn
- From: mark at buttery.org (Shirley Márquez Dúlcey)
- [Discuss] Stallman stubborn
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Stallman stubborn
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Stallman stubborn
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Stallman stubborn
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Stallman stubborn
- Index(es):
