BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] one vs many static IP addresses
- Subject: [Discuss] one vs many static IP addresses
- From: mark at buttery.org (Shirley Márquez Dúlcey)
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 09:16:07 -0500
- In-reply-to: <BY2PR04MB18420AE0D68E8963281575ACDCF20@BY2PR04MB1842.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
- References: <56898298.9020003@stephenadler.com> <BY2PR04MB18420AE0D68E8963281575ACDCF20@BY2PR04MB1842.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
> In the distant past, you needed multiple IP addresses to name based virtual hosting with SSL, but that > problem was solved by SNI, Server Name Indication. In the even more distant past you needed multiple IP address to do name based virtual hosting at all. But we're talking REALLY ancient history: the days of Netscape 1.0. Name-based virtual hosting became possible with the adoption of HTTP 1.1 which was officially released in January 1997, and browsers such as Netscape 2.0 and IE 2.0 had already started to include its features even before the release of the standard.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] one vs many static IP addresses
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] one vs many static IP addresses
- References:
- [Discuss] one vs many static IP addresses
- From: adler at stephenadler.com (Stephen Adler)
- [Discuss] one vs many static IP addresses
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- [Discuss] one vs many static IP addresses
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] one vs many static IP addresses
- Next by Date: [Discuss] one vs many static IP addresses
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] one vs many static IP addresses
- Next by thread: [Discuss] one vs many static IP addresses
- Index(es):