BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] one vs many static IP addresses
- Subject: [Discuss] one vs many static IP addresses
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 09:50:17 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAMdng5tw2xZLx+jJ93yu+Y_3ojnxotMSR7+mCn6xdCxT9kqJHQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <56898298.9020003@stephenadler.com> <BY2PR04MB18420AE0D68E8963281575ACDCF20@BY2PR04MB1842.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <CAMdng5tw2xZLx+jJ93yu+Y_3ojnxotMSR7+mCn6xdCxT9kqJHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Recently I have been playing with programming the Raspberry Pi 2 (pretty dang powerful). And cheap, I can have more than one! Oh, but I want to be able to get to them, and what a pain in the butt to be constantly messing with port forwarding, and putting sshd on--what was that port number again? If I had enough IP addresses that I didn't need to NAT? That would be cool. -kb, the Kent who only has one external IP address.
- References:
- [Discuss] one vs many static IP addresses
- From: adler at stephenadler.com (Stephen Adler)
- [Discuss] one vs many static IP addresses
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- [Discuss] one vs many static IP addresses
- From: mark at buttery.org (Shirley Márquez Dúlcey)
- [Discuss] one vs many static IP addresses
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] one vs many static IP addresses
- Next by Date: [Discuss] one vs many static IP addresses
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] one vs many static IP addresses
- Next by thread: [Discuss] External security Re: one vs many static IP addresses
- Index(es):