BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- Subject: [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 13:52:55 -0500
- In-reply-to: <201601061824.u06IOnJI025993@dsl092-065-009.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net>
- References: <f1b9707b8c7d334e6a63e30d793b55ca.squirrel@webmail.ci.net> <568BF596.7020406@gmail.com> <CAMdng5ux-T7_=rRFTGSCmroexfb42dfdPy+5uC_-R7_yZO_KkA@mail.gmail.com> <568C14D7.4080506@gmail.com> <201601060251.u062pufj018428@dsl092-065-009.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net> <568C9811.90400@gmail.com> <20160106150518.GA24973@SDF.ORG> <568D473B.2070808@gmail.com> <201601061753.u06Hrpjm025840@dsl092-065-009.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net> <568D5937.3090907@gmail.com> <201601061824.u06IOnJI025993@dsl092-065-009.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net>
On 1/6/2016 1:24 PM, Robert Krawitz wrote: > I use a 6x10 (pixel) font in emacs and xterm. Using a 9x15 font at > twice the linear resolution would let me get quite a lot more on the > screen. 50% more. Which is more but the other 50% is wasted by the upscaling. You would need a physically larger display to offset that waste. > I'm currently using a 10 point font for general purpose on my laptop; > I set my display to lie and claim 72 dpi. 8 (in particular) and 9 > point fonts are harder to read not so much because they're smaller as > because the screen doesn't have enough pixels to render them as > cleanly as the 10 point font. I suggest that this has more to do with your choice of fonts. The X bitmap fonts in particular are absolutely horrible. Try Cousine, currently my preferred monospaced font. -- Rich P.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- From: rlk at alum.mit.edu (Robert Krawitz)
- [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- References:
- [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- From: mark at buttery.org (Shirley Márquez Dúlcey)
- [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- From: rlk at alum.mit.edu (Robert Krawitz)
- [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- From: smallm at SDF.ORG (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- From: rlk at alum.mit.edu (Robert Krawitz)
- [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- From: rlk at alum.mit.edu (Robert Krawitz)
- [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- Next by Date: [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- Next by thread: [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- Index(es):