BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Separate commercial firewall?
- Subject: [Discuss] Separate commercial firewall?
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 13:22:19 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAPiok-qJiNqPNZ8vyiF_EcHpOkOnLNP-jh4SBJXQ2=dD_mb-JQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAPiok-qJiNqPNZ8vyiF_EcHpOkOnLNP-jh4SBJXQ2=dD_mb-JQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 12:52:14PM -0500, John Hall wrote: > In what cases is an integrated firewall in a good home router insufficient? > If it's not necessary could this unit actually compromise security? > Two different directions: 1. home routers are often targets of attack because: there are thousands of them, they don't get updated code, they are often managed badly or set to defaults, and the people depending on them might not even notice. 2. anything in your path can compromise security. The question is, given that the ISP already controls the upstream router, is there anything that they can do with the local box that they can't do upstream? To which the answer is, maybe, but why bother? -dsr-
- References:
- [Discuss] Separate commercial firewall?
- From: johnhall2.0 at gmail.com (John Hall)
- [Discuss] Separate commercial firewall?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Separate commercial firewall?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Separate commercial firewall?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Separate commercial firewall?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Separate commercial firewall?
- Index(es):