BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] DMARC, SPF, DKIM
- Subject: [Discuss] DMARC, SPF, DKIM
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 19:47:26 +0000
- In-reply-to: <20160211193734.GA6946@randomstring.org>
- References: <SN1PR04MB1856C8E2C88CF7251082D385DCA80@SN1PR04MB1856.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <20160211193734.GA6946@randomstring.org>
> From: Dan Ritter [mailto:dsr at randomstring.org] > > I have been perfectly happy running randomstring.org (at home) > and $WORKPLACE's mail servers with none of DMARC, SPF or DKIM > for years and years now. Ignorance is bliss. :-) Or some phrase involving "head in the sand." :-) Ignoring climate change doesn't make it not real. :-) Because of not using any spf/dkim/dmarc, the mail you send is more likely to land in other peoples' spam folders, so you don't reach them and you'll rarely ever know. Also, when some spammer wants to spam your friends, they forge messages from you, and your friends are more likely to receive it, and fall for whatever the phishing bait is.
- References:
- [Discuss] DMARC, SPF, DKIM
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- [Discuss] DMARC, SPF, DKIM
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] DMARC, SPF, DKIM
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] DMARC, SPF, DKIM
- Next by Date: [Discuss] looking for non-cisco router and firewall
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] DMARC, SPF, DKIM
- Next by thread: [Discuss] looking for non-cisco router and firewall
- Index(es):