BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Subject: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 11:54:09 -0400
- In-reply-to: <56FF3D0E.90004@mattgillen.net>
- References: <CANaytcd4GaTv2790aYUxuh8N2czR4HcHeZasSKBvctaHzAxurA@mail.gmail.com> <20160401012728.GB31884@dragontoe.org> <20160401211152.3b176568@mydesk.domain.cxm> <56FF24ED.2080601@gmail.com> <56FF3D0E.90004@mattgillen.net>
On 4/1/2016 11:31 PM, Matthew Gillen wrote: > The problem the FBI had even if they modified the OS themselves was > signing it as an official update so that the phone would accept it... The terms of the GPLv3 prohibit the use of digital signatures to prevent the execution of modified software. -- Rich P.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: me at mattgillen.net (Matthew Gillen)
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- References:
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: slitt at troubleshooters.com (Steve Litt)
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: me at mattgillen.net (Matthew Gillen)
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Apple FUD?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Apple FUD?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Index(es):
