BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Subject: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 14:19:36 -0500
- In-reply-to: <20160401211152.3b176568@mydesk.domain.cxm>
- References: <CANaytcd4GaTv2790aYUxuh8N2czR4HcHeZasSKBvctaHzAxurA@mail.gmail.com> <20160401012728.GB31884@dragontoe.org> <20160401211152.3b176568@mydesk.domain.cxm>
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 09:11:52PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 20:27:28 -0500 Derek Martin <invalid at pizzashack.org> wrote: > > > I think there's no compelling reason to see releasing software > > under a non-GPL-style license as inherently a bad thing. > > Until the corporation patents a proprietary modification of the Open > Source software. I'm generally opposed to software patents, but even then... If they created something genuinely new, to which prior art (based on the original work) could not apply, so be it. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
- References:
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: slitt at troubleshooters.com (Steve Litt)
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Mail screwed the pooch
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Mail screwed the pooch
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Index(es):
