BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Subject: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: greg at freephile.com (Greg Rundlett (freephile))
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:07:05 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAPiok-rx0qU8k6i6ebOYhRRKQGQo9X_qKn5G8FzN5m+TRu4=tg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CANaytcd4GaTv2790aYUxuh8N2czR4HcHeZasSKBvctaHzAxurA@mail.gmail.com> <56F5AB13.3070505@arlsoft.com> <CAPiok-rx0qU8k6i6ebOYhRRKQGQo9X_qKn5G8FzN5m+TRu4=tg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 6:15 PM, John Hall <johnhall2.0 at gmail.com> wrote: > https://www.usa.gov/government-works > It would be great to hear from an IP lawyer on this. > I am not a lawyer, but I've been educating myself about patent, trademark and copyright legislation and practice for a long time; specifically as it relates to the GPL. I wish there were good IP attorneys contributing to this forum because it's not my day job. But, I've got a list of lawyers related to GPL work at https://freephile.org/wiki/Free_Software_Supporters#Lawyers Additions welcome. All licenses are attached through copyright laws and federal government > works cannot have a copyright so can not be released under a license. There > are literally no restrictions except those noted at the above link. > In general, the public domain part is combined with the GPL part. e.g. https://github.com/WhiteHouse/petitions
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Apple FUD?
- Index(es):