BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Subject: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 12:18:37 -0400
- In-reply-to: <570910B0.7090601@riseup.net>
- References: <chxtwjdh297.fsf@iceland.freeshell.org> <5706DCE3.2090009@riseup.net> <5706FD5F.5050307@gmail.com> <57071856.2020103@riseup.net> <5707B836.8040503@gmail.com> <57085CB2.50604@riseup.net> <57086E24.4070209@gmail.com> <570910B0.7090601@riseup.net>
On 4/9/2016 10:24 AM, IngeGNUe wrote: > holder. Makes sense? Yup. I'm still not sure that you can actually take a fully copyleft work and make it fully proprietary, though. Copyleft entails the copyright holder forfeiting some rights to control the work and it is not clear to me if those rights, once forfeited, can be reclaimed. -- Rich P.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: rlk at alum.mit.edu (Robert Krawitz)
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- References:
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: smallm at sdf.org (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: ingegnue at riseup.net (IngeGNUe)
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: ingegnue at riseup.net (IngeGNUe)
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: ingegnue at riseup.net (IngeGNUe)
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: ingegnue at riseup.net (IngeGNUe)
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Index(es):
