BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Permission denied
- Subject: [Discuss] Permission denied
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 15:30:50 -0400
- In-reply-to: <22297.9331.570557.997058@snorkack.blazemonger.com>
- References: <571919B5.8030503@gmail.com> <22297.9331.570557.997058@snorkack.blazemonger.com>
On 4/21/2016 3:05 PM, Daniel Barrett wrote: > If only it were that simple. The Administrators ACL already has Full > Control of parent "foo" and all its contents, recursively. We have > also run a recursive "Change Permissions" operation several times for > "foo", just to be sure, without fixing the problem. Well. Someone set the permissions pretty badly. With great power comes great ease in shooting yourself in the foot. My understanding of fixing that is to back up the permissions just in case (yes, you can do this with NTFS) and run icacls with /RESET to delete the current permissions and restore the filesystem defaults. And check the permissions on C:\ just in case the problem is at the top. Also, your trick on Linux? I can make it so that "sudo rm -f" won't delete the file or directory and you won't be able to fix it if you don't know how I did it. -- Rich P.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Permission denied
- From: dbarrett at blazemonger.com (Daniel Barrett)
- [Discuss] Permission denied
- References:
- [Discuss] Permission denied
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Permission denied
- From: dbarrett at blazemonger.com (Daniel Barrett)
- [Discuss] Permission denied
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Permission denied
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Whence distributed operating systems?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Permission denied
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Permission denied
- Index(es):