BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Subject: [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 14:36:51 -0400
- In-reply-to: <20170913154439.55F40141AF3@localhost>
- References: <sjmefrduz8f.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <62af97f0-2e03-7def-29d1-946887a1d169@gmail.com> <sjmr2vct1e3.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <21407534-2722-cddc-f12a-1a7e5638bb66@gmail.com> <71734a1abaa0465e0b50db925a55f0db.squirrel@mail2.ihtfp.org> <CAAbKA3VUy0bfzURkPY-Ys0iXwk0bgn4wwD0Nd5JceR9ULTNkiQ@mail.gmail.com> <bd135daf-6684-0a43-7ab8-082c4d469a69@gmail.com> <sjm4ls6u0np.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <0a2b0620-8114-92cf-eb53-79be94a1f0be@gmail.com> <20170913154439.55F40141AF3@localhost>
On 9/13/2017 11:44 AM, Robert Krawitz wrote: > On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:38:36 -0400, Richard Pieri wrote: >> 1080p video streams (MPEG-4) need about 5-8 Mbps burst bandwidth. >> Gigabit Ethernet has practical throughput about 300Mbps. > > ??? I routinely get over 100 MB/sec (>800 Mbps) transferring files -- > even with scp -- between systems with fast enough disks. If I'm not mistaken that's with jumbo frames enabled. Consumer NICs typically do not support jumbo frames. Regardless, if you're getting ~2.5 times my throughput estimate then your MythTV usage is consuming about 2% of your available bandwidth instead of my 5% estimate, so instead of wasting 95% of the network bandwidth by not using it you're wasting 98% of it. If you were doing video editing then that would be a different story. This is large(ish) scale bulk data transfers where high sustained throughput is necessary. But then, you would do this kind of wiring in a studio environment, not the entire residence. So, yeah, whole-home wiring just doesn't make sense. -- Rich P.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: rlk at alum.mit.edu (Robert Krawitz)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- References:
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: derek at ihtfp.com (Derek Atkins)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: derek at ihtfp.com (Derek Atkins)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: derek at ihtfp.com (Derek Atkins)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: derek at ihtfp.com (Derek Atkins)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: rlk at alum.mit.edu (Robert Krawitz)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Index(es):