BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Ubuntu 17.10: As messed up as it appears in first impression?
- Subject: [Discuss] Ubuntu 17.10: As messed up as it appears in first impression?
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 01:51:14 -0400
- In-reply-to: <fb2b05d3-277e-5a0c-9d3c-fc26e594deea@thekramers.net>
- References: <fb2b05d3-277e-5a0c-9d3c-fc26e594deea@thekramers.net>
> Other opinions on it welcome, but specifically: > > 1) Is Ubuntu 17.10 ready for casual use? One data point -- The one package (ack ex ack-grep) that I'm on the upstream team for has neither prior nor next version available for 17.10 Artful. Something died in testing and wasn't resolved, just allowed to ship without. (Looks like a systemic testing issue in our test results, makes no sense.) So I'd vote NO (I try to stick with LTS releases for a reason. And don't take those until (2n).04.1 Eschew the Dot Uh Oh. ) -- Bill Ricker bill.n1vux at gmail.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/n1vux
- References:
- [Discuss] Ubuntu 17.10: As messed up as it appears in first impression?
- From: david at thekramers.net (David Kramer)
- [Discuss] Ubuntu 17.10: As messed up as it appears in first impression?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Ubuntu 17.10: As messed up as it appears in first impression?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Ubuntu 17.10: As messed up as it appears in first impression?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Ubuntu 17.10: As messed up as it appears in first impression?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Ubuntu 17.10: As messed up as it appears in first impression?
- Index(es):