BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] How Daylight Saving Time Messes With Hospitals
- Subject: [Discuss] How Daylight Saving Time Messes With Hospitals
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 19:48:34 -0500
- In-reply-to: <5be22d00.1c69fb81.af535.9915@mx.google.com>
- References: <5be218f2.1c69fb81.61404.53ae@mx.google.com> <chxk1lpyes7.fsf@sdf.org> <5be22d00.1c69fb81.af535.9915@mx.google.com>
Date/time calculations not using a library accessing the historical TZ/DST data in Olsen TZdata file is erroneous. Alas for future dates, one can't even assume the TZ spec won't change between now and then, as it can be undone by politicians, witness Morocco cancelling DST with two days' notice recently. On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 6:20 PM Mike Small <smallm at sdf.org> replied: > If database programmers would only always use UTC for their storage > format and translate as necessary for presentation it wouldn't be so > bad, Right on. If a Date-Time isn't marked with explicit TZ indicator (including DST status indication ) it better be implicitly Zulu or it is buggy data already. > but I guess in your example case it's too late now. yeah, should have fixed that in 1999 ... > Maybe you'd like this article if you haven't seen it already: > http://naggum.no/lugm-time.html Interesting On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 7:08 PM Rich Pieri <richard.pieri at gmail.com> re-replied > If hospitals and doctors from the 2000s and 1990s and 1980s and 1970s > and 1960s and 1950s and... only always used UTC for their records... > but they didn't. If they at least annotate 2018 Nov 4, 1:30 AM EDT vs Nov 4, 1:30 AM EST, and also 1972 October 29, you're good, you can use TZdata to validate and convert UTC for storage. If they failed to note TZ during that hour because the hospital never moves so they don't need a TZ the rest of the year on paper, well yeah, it's ambiguous data -- and banning DST in the future won't fix your ambiguous historical data. And our modern systems can require recording of the TZ/DST in effect at time of admission/birth/time-of-other-service at point of data capture going forward, so you get no value from banning DST. (Although most people who SAY they want to ban DST, particularly in N.E., actually mean they want to abandon Winter time and move permanent summer time, UTC-4, which would be DST-less AST.) > It's not just my example case. An EMR system today has to accomodate > not only data today but data spanning the entire lifetimes of patients > with all of the inconsistencies of different paper records and > procedures and EMRs and timekeeping. And it's impossible to unify > because the information needed to unify those records does not exist, > never did. Yes, you have data ingest problem when pulling in old paper records and records sent over in incomplete exchange formats from other systems. Ambiguous data that wasn't properly cleaned at the time will always be ambiguous. Unless you borrow a timemachine and kill Ben Franklin so the idea of DST never spreads, you can't fix that. (I think he did more good than harm, so I recommend against it.) OTOH, TimeZones were created for the convenience of the Railroads and their passengers, and welcomed by the financial markets, and DST was promulgated for the convenience of Little League and out-door chores like lawn mowing (before power mowers it took longer). They were never welcomed by farmers, who worked can-to-can't and milked the cows at the same sun-time -- and customers thinking time changed rankled them! Today, the digital financial markets handle TZ differences between LON, NYC/BOS, CHI, SF, TOK, and HK markets without difficulty -- and we trade around the clock. Boston's small stock exchange could go on Atlantic time without discouraging volume; opening "floor" trading an hour before New York might actually attract volume. As more and more parks and ballfields have flood lights, does DST buy us anything that wouldn't better be addressed by WFH and Flex Time? No. Flex time reduces congestion and would encourage bicycling later in the year. If we wanted to join India and Newfoundland as rebels, we could even split off N.E. as a half-hour timezone based on our local meridian, or adopt permanent DST by joining NB/NS/PEI as AST (but without ADT/DST). 20 years ago either permanent DST (=AST year round) or half-hour zone would not have been practical because network TV only recognized 2 TZ, ET & PT, but with streaming/binging/DVR today, would anyone care if GoT came on an hour "later" in Boston just as it is an hour "earlier" in Chicago today? -- Bill Ricker bill.n1vux at gmail.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/n1vux
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] How Daylight Saving Time Messes With Hospitals
- From: smallm at sdf.org (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] How Daylight Saving Time Messes With Hospitals
- References:
- [Discuss] How Daylight Saving Time Messes With Hospitals
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] How Daylight Saving Time Messes With Hospitals
- From: smallm at sdf.org (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] How Daylight Saving Time Messes With Hospitals
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] How Daylight Saving Time Messes With Hospitals
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Feedspot and other RSS Readers
- Next by Date: [Discuss] How Daylight Saving Time Messes With Hospitals
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] How Daylight Saving Time Messes With Hospitals
- Next by thread: [Discuss] How Daylight Saving Time Messes With Hospitals
- Index(es):