BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] WSL 2

Subject: [Discuss] WSL 2
From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 17:46:29 -0400
In-reply-to: <CAJFsZ=pn9gzwDPVcbMPik0Uh8HSgzEAjsGQ+MCzbySO2FNSXng@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5cd0a95c.1c69fb81.1d77b.d62d@mx.google.com> <CAJFsZ=oqAwzbeLqa68y52DWZNCnHBxH84ir7uFeJgsZx=v4=QQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJFsZ=rh7uqM3xnSn0GGmbn7+FUOGFh6p7sE8ndp_tsw6yxe_A@mail.gmail.com> <5cd0ed72.1c69fb81.cbfc7.9b6a@mx.google.com> <CAJFsZ=pn9gzwDPVcbMPik0Uh8HSgzEAjsGQ+MCzbySO2FNSXng@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 7 May 2019 16:16:07 -0400
Bill Bogstad <bogstad at pobox.com> wrote:

> systemd, so they fail.  I'm hoping that
> WSL2 will allow a "full" Ubuntu distribution to be run so I can
> concentrate on getting work done rather than
> figuring out why "standard" things don't work.  If they are going to
> be supporting a full Linux kernel environment,

Given the phrase "native Docker" and several other points made in that
blog post it stands to reason that they will.

> it seems to me that it is a pretty short step to allowing an arbitrary
> init process, whether it be systemd, SystemV init,
> or something else.

Except for the things you have with hard dependencies on systemd. Which
is unfortunate.

-- 
Rich Pieri

References:
- [Discuss] WSL 2
  - From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] WSL 2
  - From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- [Discuss] WSL 2
  - From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- [Discuss] WSL 2
  - From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] WSL 2
  - From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)

Prev by Date: [Discuss] WSL 2
Next by Date: [Discuss] Trying to install Tor on Fedora
Previous by thread: [Discuss] WSL 2
Next by thread: [Discuss] WSL 2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread