BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] RMS

Subject: [Discuss] RMS
From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:29:44 -0400
In-reply-to: <a6a49bac-8a08-51da-3751-e951c2052228@arlsoft.com>
References: <mailman.13873.1568931017.14410.discuss@blu.org> <878sqj3hah.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <5d8433ac.1c69fb81.55dd8.0c4b@mx.google.com> <20190921000304.GD3811@bladeshadow.org> <CAFv2jcaVu3NkX3GdS9NpCfnp=FQ57O=-tF77TmFuhDSaP9V16Q@mail.gmail.com> <5d860f8d.1c69fb81.947a8.5ede@mx.google.com> <20190923162326.GF3811@bladeshadow.org> <20190923165648.GG3811@bladeshadow.org> <CAMdng5tkNa5c0pVKo+vt2rG9W5Ov90=xD_v7qeJQ0gETbDyCkA@mail.gmail.com> <a6a49bac-8a08-51da-3751-e951c2052228@arlsoft.com>

On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 20:11:33 -0400
MBR <mbr at arlsoft.com> wrote:

> I think Thomas Lord's rebuttal of Thomas Bushnell's article is well 
> worth reading. (See 
> https://twitter.com/thomas_lord/status/1174433645110513664). From
> Lord's comments:

Given what I know of RMS' behavior and my own interactions with the
man? There's some hyperbole on both sides of this but Bushnell is the
less exaggerated of the two.

-- 
Rich Pieri

References:
- [Discuss] RMS
  - From: worley at alum.mit.edu (Dale R. Worley)
- [Discuss] RMS
  - From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] RMS
  - From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] RMS
  - From: abreauj at gmail.com (John Abreau)
- [Discuss] RMS
  - From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] RMS
  - From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] RMS
  - From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] RMS
  - From: mark at buttery.org (Shirley Márquez Dúlcey)
- [Discuss] RMS
  - From: mbr at arlsoft.com (MBR)

Prev by Date: [Discuss] RMS
Next by Date: [Discuss] RMS
Previous by thread: [Discuss] RMS
Next by thread: [Discuss] RMS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread