BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Potential Subject for BLU Meeting
- Subject: [Discuss] Potential Subject for BLU Meeting
- From: abreauj at gmail.com (John Abreau)
- Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 05:16:49 -0400
- In-reply-to: <c9881629f092c80b334047519838aeac.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com>
- References: <d03d3420-1c64-8641-378e-4d86416e7ba4@sillydog.org> <CAEvgogHd1=0U9VUSxsn4v2X8ObpHB+kwt59F4KTdcoDp9shYPw@mail.gmail.com> <c9881629f092c80b334047519838aeac.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com>
If we ignore containers, we've had the following meetings about VMs, I only looked back as far as 2009. April 2019 | Gnome Boxes July 2012 | The Virtual Desktop March 2012 | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager November 2009 | AMD-V: AMD64 virtualization extension October 2009 | Virtualization on the Desktop February 2009 | Virtualization Deep Dive Day A talk on the current status of VMs would be useful. I run a few VMs at home, but I don't run them on my desktop or laptop machines; I have a rackmount server I purchased on eBay with 32 GB of RAM and24 CPU cores, and I run kvm/quemu on it with CentOS 7 as the OS. On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 3:52 PM <markw at mohawksoft.com> wrote: > Containers are NOT a light weight vm. Processes in a container are > processes in the main system. > > Containers are essentially processes run in a chroot jail. The LXC stuff > in the linux kernel adds a lot of namespace isolation and tools for > containers, but in the end a process in a container are processes in your > system. > > In a VM the hypervisor has a process ID, but all the processes in a VM are > in the VM and not really exposed to the system. > > > We have had many meetings on vms and containers. Vms have been around > > since > > the 1970s. KVM has been in the mainline kernel since 2007. Containers are > > a > > more lightweight vm. > > > > -- > > Jerry Feldman <gaf.linux at gmail.com> > > Boston Linux and Unix http://www.blu.org > > PGP key id: 6F6BB6E7 > > PGP Key fingerprint: 0EDC 2FF5 53A6 8EED 84D1 3050 5715 B88D 6F6 > > B B6E7 > > > > On Fri, Oct 22, 2021, 10:34 AM Edward <epp at sillydog.org> wrote: > > > >> Virtual Machines? > >> > >> I did a Google search on the BLU site for any past meetings pertaining > >> to VM's and it found none. > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Discuss mailing list > >> Discuss at lists.blu.org > >> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Discuss mailing list > > Discuss at lists.blu.org > > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at lists.blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > -- John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix Email: abreauj at gmail.com / WWW http://www.abreau.net / PGP-Key-ID 0x920063C6 PGP-Key-Fingerprint A5AD 6BE1 FEFE 8E4F 5C23 C2D0 E885 E17C 9200 63C6
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Potential Subject for BLU Meeting
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] Potential Subject for BLU Meeting
- References:
- [Discuss] Potential Subject for BLU Meeting
- From: epp at sillydog.org (Edward)
- [Discuss] Potential Subject for BLU Meeting
- From: gaf.linux at gmail.com (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] Potential Subject for BLU Meeting
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] Potential Subject for BLU Meeting
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Potential Subject for BLU Meeting
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Potential Subject for BLU Meeting
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Potential Subject for BLU Meeting
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Potential Subject for BLU Meeting
- Index(es):