BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] html issue
- Subject: [Discuss] html issue
- From: lconrad at laymusic.org (Laura Conrad)
- Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2022 13:34:23 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAFv2jcaxnoGKRZOjqTvqThEM6Uwtn-mfd7LwA2eoyjBOq36BLg@mail.gmail.com> (John Abreau's message of "Sun, 5 Jun 2022 12:35:41 -0400")
- References: <Yk9YwB2OwFB1Txse@alphacent.localdomain> <CAFv2jcaxnoGKRZOjqTvqThEM6Uwtn-mfd7LwA2eoyjBOq36BLg@mail.gmail.com>
>>>>> "John" == John Abreau <abreauj at gmail.com> writes: John> Just noticed this uread thread in my inbox. John> The issue is firefox, and I imagine, other web browsers, won't follow John> file:// urls from a web page; such urls work when entered directly at the John> address bar, but be ignored when placed within an html document. I believe John> it's a security measure intended to thwart cross-site scripting attacks. This is probably a different html issue from the one I've been dealing with. But I'll describe my problem and solution in case it helps someone else. When I upgraded to Ubuntu 22.04LTS, firefox stopped displaying emails from emacs. Emacs wrote a file like /tmp/<filename>, and firefox couldn't access it. It turns out that 22.04 installs firefox from a snap, and snap programs can't access /tmp files. (They claim to be able to access files in /home, but I wasn't able to verify that.) The solution I'm using is the one described here: <https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2022/04/how-to-install-firefox-deb-apt-ubuntu-22-04>. I had done something like this a few weeks ago, and when I sat down at the computer this morning, after updating software without thinking, I was back not being able to access the /tmp files. This version does some pinning and adding instructions to unattended upgrades, that I don't remember doing before, so maybe it won't "upgrade" me again. -- Laura (mailto:lconrad at laymusic.org) (617) 661-8097 233 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02139 <http://www.laymusic.org/> <http://www.serpentpublications.org> Copyright law has abandoned its reason for being: to encourage learning and the creation of new works. Instead, its principal functions now are to preserve existing failed business models, to suppress new business models and technologies, and to obtain, if possible, enormous windfall profits from activity that not only causes no harm, but which is beneficial to copyright owners. William Patry, in his farewell post on "The Patry Copyright Blog".
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] html issue
- From: epp at null.net (epp at null.net)
- [Discuss] html issue
- From: joe at polcari.com (Joe Polcari)
- [Discuss] html issue
- References:
- [Discuss] html issue
- From: abreauj at gmail.com (John Abreau)
- [Discuss] html issue
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] html issue
- Next by Date: [Discuss] html issue
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] html issue
- Next by thread: [Discuss] html issue
- Index(es):