BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] printer issue
- Subject: [Discuss] printer issue
- From: benjamin.p.kallus.gr at dartmouth.edu (Benjamin Kallus)
- Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 22:13:27 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAEvgogF7ww15QsJZ=WRAMcbdCotwCWnn8BA98EWo8NM54Wot4Q@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAEvgogF7ww15QsJZ=WRAMcbdCotwCWnn8BA98EWo8NM54Wot4Q@mail.gmail.com>
However, to connect a printer to the LAN is to trust the printer's IP stack (you probably shouldnt unless your printer is brand new) Ultimately, a network printer is usually just an ARM or MIPS computer running ancient busybox/linux. Do you really want that on your network? > On Jun 24, 2022, at 8:47 PM, Jerry Feldman <gaf.linux at gmail.com> wrote: > > ?IMHO the printer should be on the LAN. Connecting it to the computer means > that the computer needs to be running for the printer to be accessible to > other systems. > > -- > Jerry Feldman <gaf.linux at gmail.com> > Boston Linux and Unix http://www.blu.org > PGP key id: 6F6BB6E7 > PGP Key fingerprint: 0EDC 2FF5 53A6 8EED 84D1 3050 5715 B88D 6F6 > B B6E7 > >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2022, 8:38 PM <epp at null.net> wrote: >> >> Another issue with the Asus - when it was functioning as a standard >> router, was that it would not enable IPv6. The only way it could be used >> for both IPv4 and 6, was to configure it as an AP. There are settings in >> its firmware to enable IPv6 when used as a standard router, but none of >> the settings worked. >> >> Is it the general opinion that a printer should be directly connected to >> the computer, rather than via Ethernet/WiFi? >> >> >>> On 6/24/22 20:16, Jerry Feldman wrote: >>> The issue you raise is privacy. If you use the isp provided gateway or >> your >>> own replacement, devices will get up addresses from that gateway's nat. >> If >>> you get a router, and set it up to manage your lan, you are insulating >> your >>> devices from the network. Of course, if you want a device accessible from >>> the outside, that is a different story. >>> >>> -- >>> Jerry Feldman <gaf.linux at gmail.com> >>> Boston Linux and Unix http://www.blu.org >>> PGP key id: 6F6BB6E7 >>> PGP Key fingerprint: 0EDC 2FF5 53A6 8EED 84D1 3050 5715 B88D 6F6 >>> B B6E7 >>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2022, 7:51 PM <epp at null.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Comcast will allow a customer to use a personally-owned modem, if this >>>> is what you're referring to. They have a list online of the approved >>>> modems, that I presume were tested to ensure they work. >>>> >>>> I have an Asus router that is configured as an access point, which I >>>> have used in the past. As an AP, the devices on the internal network >>>> would pull IP's from the Comcast gateway, but are physically/WiFi >>>> connected to the AP. A negative to this, is that (unlike the Comcast >>>> gateway) the router/AP will not allow the same SSID to be used for both >>>> 2.4 and 5.0 GHz WiFI. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 6/24/22 19:04, John Abreau wrote: >>>>> I generally recommend minimizing the amount of trust you give to your >>>>> ISP. I've switched between different ISPs over the years, and if the >>>>> ISP insists on providing its own wifi router, I would connect only one >>>>> device to that router: my own personal wifi router. >>>>> >>>>> My internal home network is always under my personal administrative >>>>> control, and I only use the ISP to transport bits back and forth >>>>> between my private network and the public Internet. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 4:50 PM <epp at null.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> My printer is an OfficeJet Pro 8210 and it will prompt to download >>>> and >>>>> install a software upgrade, if available, when it's connected to >> the >>>>> network. It has upgraded the software once, since I've had it. I >>>>> do not >>>>> know how often it checks HP for updates. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 6/24/22 15:54, Ben Kallus wrote: >>>>>> It's worth noting the security risks that come with network >>>>> printers. >>>>>> Their firmwares is not often updated, and has been shown to be >>>>>> insecure time and time again.^1 You may be better off connecting >>>>> it to >>>>>> a computer you trust, then exposing it as a network printer >> through >>>>>> that computer. The photosmart D110 is the printer I had as a >>>>> kid, and >>>>>> I don't think it's gotten an update in a very long time. >>>>>> >>>>>> [1]: >>>>> >>>> >> https://techventures.columbia.edu/news-and-events/latest-news/symbiote-technology-created-ang-cui-and-salvatore-stolfo-named-one >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jun 24, 2022, at 1:58 PM, epp at null.net wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ?On 6/24/22 11:21, dan moylan wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> running fc36 on lenevo thinkpad T460 (alphacent), printer hp >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> photosmart d110. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> because of other problems, xfinity just came and provided a >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> new modem/router/wifi. i logged into xfinity's device and >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> set up reserved ip addresses for my stuff in accordance with >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> /etc/hosts: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1 alphacent.localdomain alphacent >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 10.0.0.1 xfinity.localdomain xfinity >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 10.0.0.63 aldeberon.localdomain aldeberon >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 10.0.0.62 d110.localdomain d110 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 10.0.0.61 unknown >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 10.0.0.60 alphacent.localdomain alphacent >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 50.87.218.82 bluedan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> all is well, except for the printer. i went through the >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> wireless setup on the printer which declared success, but >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the xfinitiy modem shows it as an offline device -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> un-pingable. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> moylan nmp[1111] nmap -Pn 10.0.0.62 > 3log >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Starting Nmap 7.92 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2022-06-24 >> 11:14 >>>> EDT >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nmap scan report for d110.localdomain (10.0.0.62) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Host is up (0.10s latency). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All 1000 scanned ports on d110.localdomain (10.0.0.62) are >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> in ignored states. Not shown: 990 filtered tcp ports >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (no-response), 10 filtered tcp ports (host-unreach) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 7.04 seconds >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> what's going on? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ole dan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I swapped out my gateway with Comcast last month because of the >>>>> speed >>>>>>> increases back in March. My HP printer was connected to the >>>>> previous and >>>>>>> is connected to the new, via Ethernet. The printer apparently >>>>> retained >>>>>>> its IP address in its settings, so once it was connected to the >>>> new >>>>>>> gateway, it just worked. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If the above is the IP address of the printer and HPLIP is >> already >>>>>>> installed, as superuser/root, running: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> hp-setup -a 10.0.0.62 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> in a terminal window, should otherwise configure it. >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Discuss mailing list >>>>> Discuss at lists.blu.org >>>>> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix >>>>> Email: abreauj at gmail.com / WWW http://www.abreau.net / PGP-Key-ID >>>>> 0x920063C6 >>>>> PGP-Key-Fingerprint A5AD 6BE1 FEFE 8E4F 5C23 C2D0 E885 E17C 9200 63C6 >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> Discuss at lists.blu.org >> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at lists.blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
- References:
- [Discuss] printer issue
- From: gaf.linux at gmail.com (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] printer issue
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] printer issue
- Next by Date: [Discuss] printer issue vs Lan Isolation
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] printer issue
- Next by thread: [Discuss] printer issue vs Lan Isolation
- Index(es):