BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Failing WD Disks
- Subject: [Discuss] Failing WD Disks
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 16:22:56 -0400
- In-reply-to: <8be3d50f-3345-dc90-4277-b0bd3de04be3@borg.org>
- References: <ab541108-f473-9cbb-616f-0a9b27d0e6fc@borg.org> <CAMdng5t0=RvyCjGumTMp5kuYLb7Xn+BNb74dWWygW6hd-CFR4A@mail.gmail.com> <8be3d50f-3345-dc90-4277-b0bd3de04be3@borg.org>
On Thu, 18 May 2023 13:10:33 -0700 Kent Borg <kentborg at borg.org> wrote: > These are 2.5". And, to make matters worse/newer, USB-C. They were > the cheapest cost-per-byte, I figured that meant not-too-bleeding. > Grrr. Sounds like they may be SMR which means sustained write performance is going to SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK. -- \m/ (--) \m/
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Failing WD Disks
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- [Discuss] Failing WD Disks
- References:
- [Discuss] Failing WD Disks
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Failing WD Disks
- From: mark at buttery.org (Shirley Márquez Dúlcey)
- [Discuss] Failing WD Disks
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Failing WD Disks
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Failing WD Disks
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Failing WD Disks
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Failing WD Disks
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Failing WD Disks
- Index(es):
