BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Port Scanning
- Subject: [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 17:06:27 -0400
- In-reply-to: <51804f85-9275-4d89-9dc2-86234cdb299b@borg.org>
- References: <5c43eee0-caaf-45d6-8fdb-273cb3d8ea6d@borg.org> <20240801172933.yqcdeki3ntkrrl2t@randomstring.org> <51804f85-9275-4d89-9dc2-86234cdb299b@borg.org>
Kent Borg wrote: > On 8/1/24 10:29, Dan Ritter wrote: > > Zero Trust means that you don't*grant* access based on the > > sender's IP. > > I like my version better: Design and build your system so that every node is > secure enough to sit on today's open internet. That's great. Give it another name, please. I agree that's a nice way to build tailored systems; I also think that not taking advantage of the existence of both belts and suspenders is silly when you know that sometimes people change their waist size without even realizing it. -dsr-
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- References:
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Port Scanning
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Port Scanning
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Port Scanning
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Port Scanning
- Index(es):