BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Port Scanning
- Subject: [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 14:41:47 -0700
- In-reply-to: <20240801210627.bzw47tfmyxofcep3@randomstring.org>
- References: <5c43eee0-caaf-45d6-8fdb-273cb3d8ea6d@borg.org> <20240801172933.yqcdeki3ntkrrl2t@randomstring.org> <51804f85-9275-4d89-9dc2-86234cdb299b@borg.org> <20240801210627.bzw47tfmyxofcep3@randomstring.org>
On 8/1/24 14:06, Dan Ritter wrote: > I agree that's a nice way to build tailored systems Since the term "zero trust" was first coined (30-bleeping years ago!, in 1994) we have tailored a *lot* of stuff, from scratch. The entire cloud, for example, a lot by any standard. We mostly built all from scratch, following *no* ones version of zero trust. We could have, but it seems we didn't bother to even consider the possibility. "Because who needs it? We have firewalls, what's the point? firewalls work great!" *Everyone* knows firewalls are great. (Except me.) -kb
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- References:
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Port Scanning
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Port Scanning
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Port Scanning
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Port Scanning
- Index(es):