BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Interesting ZFS bug
- Subject: [Discuss] Interesting ZFS bug
- From: derek at ihtfp.com (Derek Atkins)
- Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 08:53:35 -0400
- In-reply-to: <20241004083711.5f0cbd6a.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com>
- References: <20241004083711.5f0cbd6a.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com>
Interesting. A 4-year-old bug that hasn't been fixed. Imagine that. -derek On Fri, October 4, 2024 8:37 am, Rich Pieri wrote: > https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/11140 > > Briefly: Flatpak uses fsync extensively. For reasons nobody is entirely > sure about, this causes ZFS to thrash *hard* which I discovered earlier > this week as I finally got around to switching my Calibre install from > Debian's packages (which are woefully out of date). A flatpak > installation that would take at most about 30 seconds on Btrfs or ext4 > takes an hour on ZFS. > > For me at least, the workaround is to bracket flatpak install/upgrade > commands with disabling and enabling dataset sync: > > sudo zfs set sync=disabled zfsroot/zfs/home > flatpak upgrade > sudo zfs set sync=standard zfsroot/zfs/home > > -- > \m/ (--) \m/ > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at lists.blu.org > https://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > -- Derek Atkins 617-623-3745 derek at ihtfp.com www.ihtfp.com Computer and Internet Security Consultant
- References:
- [Discuss] Interesting ZFS bug
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Interesting ZFS bug
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Interesting ZFS bug
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Interesting ZFS bug
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Interesting ZFS bug
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Interesting ZFS bug
- Index(es):