BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Interesting ZFS bug
- Subject: [Discuss] Interesting ZFS bug
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 09:30:13 -0400
- In-reply-to: <20241004083711.5f0cbd6a.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com>
- References: <20241004083711.5f0cbd6a.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com>
Yes, ZFS is aggressively syncing the file system. Do you have a cache or intent long on SSD? > https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/11140 > > Briefly: Flatpak uses fsync extensively. For reasons nobody is entirely > sure about, this causes ZFS to thrash *hard* which I discovered earlier > this week as I finally got around to switching my Calibre install from > Debian's packages (which are woefully out of date). A flatpak > installation that would take at most about 30 seconds on Btrfs or ext4 > takes an hour on ZFS. > > For me at least, the workaround is to bracket flatpak install/upgrade > commands with disabling and enabling dataset sync: > > sudo zfs set sync=disabled zfsroot/zfs/home > flatpak upgrade > sudo zfs set sync=standard zfsroot/zfs/home > > -- > \m/ (--) \m/ > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at lists.blu.org > https://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
- References:
- [Discuss] Interesting ZFS bug
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Interesting ZFS bug
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Interesting ZFS bug
- Next by Date: [Discuss] mysql issue
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Interesting ZFS bug
- Next by thread: [Discuss] mysql issue
- Index(es):