BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] More OpenWRT Stuffs

Subject: [Discuss] More OpenWRT Stuffs
From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 11:44:42 -0800
In-reply-to: <20241203130113.0ceaf407.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com>
References: <20241020173752.44225391.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com> <20241102123103.44a8c1e5.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com> <20241201095256.5d5fb670.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com> <48353f1b-1438-4fec-8e85-9b0899d06533@borg.org> <20241203130113.0ceaf407.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com>

On 12/3/24 10:01 AM, Rich Pieri wrote:
> In retrospect, I can see the lack of integrated switch as a deal
> breaker for anyone who wants more than simple connectivity. No switch
> means no VLANs and all these entail.

They call it a development board, suggesting companies wanting to base 
products on it may do so. And add more ethernet ports.

-kb

References:
- [Discuss] More OpenWRT Stuffs
  - From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] More OpenWRT Stuffs
  - From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] More OpenWRT Stuffs
  - From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)

Prev by Date: [Discuss] More OpenWRT Stuffs
Next by Date: [Discuss] Installing BSD nvi 1.81.6 on Fedora 41
Previous by thread: [Discuss] More OpenWRT Stuffs
Next by thread: [Discuss] Anyone Played with Programming Local LLMs, Such as Llama?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread