BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Not L or U But at Least Techie...
- Subject: [Discuss] Not L or U But at Least Techie...
- From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 01:27:33 -0400
- In-reply-to: <2f84f44e-8227-4b04-be8e-62a5b4610e4e@borg.org>
- References: <2e5e7f19-6295-4d04-b2de-fe62b3a53e2f@borg.org> <53836ca5e96bdb9a7e7068d2c26deeee.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com> <ac08e1546fca39c4cf15f7b5a206a8e0.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com> <2f84f44e-8227-4b04-be8e-62a5b4610e4e@borg.org>
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 1:06?PM Kent Borg <kentborg at borg.org> wrote: > > On 3/17/25 5:46 AM, markw at mohawksoft.com wrote: > > Come to think of it, you could even hook up a camera to send a picture. In > > fact, you may not need the infrared sensor at all, you could use the video > > camera and some motion detection software. There are a few available in > > raspbian. > > A camera is what I am trying to replace, sort of. > > Yes, it is extremely valuable to be able to see a picture, but motion > sensing based on that picture can be far too twitchy, particularly when > there is sunlight and wind and moving shadows. I try aiming the camera > more and more narrowly and as I reduce the alerts (slightly) the picture > becomes far less useful. But, if what I want to know about warm-blooded > critters (including humans), a passive IR detector should be great. I seem to recall that most digital camera sensors detect IR, UV, and visible light. I have pointed IR remotes at digital cameras and saw the beam blinking on the camera display. You MIGHT be able to change the filters on a cheap digital camera to block visible/UV and have an IR camera. Justa thought. Bill Bogstad
- References:
- [Discuss] Not L or U But at Least Techie…
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Not L or U But at Least Techieâ?¦
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] Not L or U But at Least Techieâ?¦
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] Not L or U But at Least Techie...
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Not L or U But at Least Techie…
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Not L or U But at Least Techie...
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Boston Linux VIRTUAL Meeting , reminder, tomorrow, Wednesday, March 19, 2025 - DeepSeek Demystified
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Not L or U But at Least Techie...
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Boston Linux VIRTUAL Meeting , reminder, tomorrow, Wednesday, March 19, 2025 - DeepSeek Demystified
- Index(es):