BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] MUMPS: was Stalwart E-mail; Was: Re: SSH options
- Subject: [Discuss] MUMPS: was Stalwart E-mail; Was: Re: SSH options
- From: slitt at troubleshooters.com (Steve Litt)
- Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 19:20:27 -0500
- In-reply-to: <20260124092057.1089fa51.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com>
- References: <61c91e0a-f658-415c-a91d-bc8cb008bf0b@borg.org> <26989.37879.578151.953291@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <26989.37936.100241.254462@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <c40fd68e-e540-471c-a253-7ae04dedaa65@borg.org> <20260119080150.7891b97d.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com> <56dcf563-62a6-4c16-aa84-ed825818def7@borg.org> <987cd7dc-096a-4a4c-be90-20e4847cdb17@bclug.ca> <20260120162647.1d90d2d7@mydesk.domain.cxm> <32eaffac-42e5-4af7-9fae-8a0514d9b97d@bclug.ca> <20260120215709.4cd9c226.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com> <96abce57-0162-4309-aa2e-a508b824c2c7@bclug.ca> <20260122110203.21ec8565.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com> <4fbd5345-e753-4fe5-8632-231ce29a362b@bclug.ca> <20260124092057.1089fa51.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com>
Rich Pieri said on Sat, 24 Jan 2026 09:20:57 -0500 >Try 60 years and MUMPS. > >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MUMPS It looks very impressive. Especially the facilities for big data. One thing though: It's based on a hierarchical database. My work with PC Focus in the mid 1980's tells me that hierarchical databases are a different breed: Efficient but difficult to do relations. And if you're not handling huge data and will accept a hierarchical database, a directory tree is perfect. A "leaf node" in a directory tree is a file that can hold a heck of a lot of bytes, more than 3.5 million characters. My UMENU2 program uses a directory hierarchy to store all its data, but of course, it's tiny data. However, as I said, for big data, I'm sure MUMPS would beat the daylights out of conventional code operating on a directory tree. SteveT Steve Litt http://444domains.com
- References:
- [Discuss] Future of X11 (was Trying to connect to internet in Debian)
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] SSH options (was Future of X11 (was Trying to connect to internet in Debian))
- From: dbarrett at blazemonger.com (Daniel Barrett)
- [Discuss] SSH options (was Future of X11 (was Trying to connect to internet in Debian))
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] SSH options (was Future of X11 (was Trying to connect to internet in Debian))
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] SSH options (was Future of X11 (was Trying to connect to internet in Debian))
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] SSH options (was Future of X11 (was Trying to connect to internet in Debian))
- From: ron at bclug.ca (Ron)
- [Discuss] SSH options (was Future of X11 (was Trying to connect to internet in Debian))
- From: slitt at troubleshooters.com (Steve Litt)
- [Discuss] SSH options (was Future of X11 (was Trying to connect to internet in Debian))
- From: ron at bclug.ca (Ron)
- [Discuss] SSH options (was Future of X11 (was Trying to connect to internet in Debian))
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] SSH options (was Future of X11 (was Trying to connect to internet in Debian))
- From: ron at bclug.ca (Ron)
- [Discuss] Stalwart E-mail; Was: Re: SSH options
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Stalwart E-mail; Was: Re: SSH options
- From: ron at bclug.ca (Ron)
- [Discuss] Stalwart E-mail; Was: Re: SSH options
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Future of X11 (was Trying to connect to internet in Debian)
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Stalwart E-mail; Was: Re: SSH options
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Stalwart E-mail; Was: Re: SSH options
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Stalwart E-mail; Was: Re: SSH options
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Stalwart E-mail; Was: Re: SSH options
- Index(es):
