BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Stalwart E-mail; Was: Re: SSH options
- Subject: [Discuss] Stalwart E-mail; Was: Re: SSH options
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 19:39:00 -0500
- In-reply-to: <20260124185320.628bb1f8@mydesk.domain.cxm>
- References: <20260119080150.7891b97d.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com> <56dcf563-62a6-4c16-aa84-ed825818def7@borg.org> <987cd7dc-096a-4a4c-be90-20e4847cdb17@bclug.ca> <20260120162647.1d90d2d7@mydesk.domain.cxm> <32eaffac-42e5-4af7-9fae-8a0514d9b97d@bclug.ca> <20260120215709.4cd9c226.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com> <96abce57-0162-4309-aa2e-a508b824c2c7@bclug.ca> <20260122110203.21ec8565.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com> <4fbd5345-e753-4fe5-8632-231ce29a362b@bclug.ca> <20260124185320.628bb1f8@mydesk.domain.cxm>
Steve Litt wrote: > To me the dead bang obvious course of action is to keep emails in > individual files, in a directory tree so that no single subdirectory > contains more than 1000 files, and then keep a copy of the email's > subject, date, to, from, cc, bcc, List-ID and full pathname of the email > in a relational database like Postres or MariaDB. Now you can lightning > quick look up by all major headers, but still have the email message > stored as an email file readable from any email client. If you simply > *must* be able to search bodies, you can have a words table that can be > joined to the emails table. J Timberlake how heavy is that? I have an existence proof that 150,000 messages in a Maildir (just the inbox) on ZFS on SSDs is entirely usable. I wish I didn't have quite so many existence proofs, but a few of the people at my company (a) hate sorting email into folders and (b) have been there 20+ years. 300,000 is currently aggravating on initial readthrough. I don't actually recommend more than, say, 50,000 messages in a Maildir (what are you doing that shouldn't be better organized than that?) but it's all quite doable. Note that is for a single person's single inbox Maildir; there's a lot lot more mail on those systems. Which is why replication becomes important. -dsr-
- References:
- [Discuss] SSH options (was Future of X11 (was Trying to connect to internet in Debian))
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] SSH options (was Future of X11 (was Trying to connect to internet in Debian))
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] SSH options (was Future of X11 (was Trying to connect to internet in Debian))
- From: ron at bclug.ca (Ron)
- [Discuss] SSH options (was Future of X11 (was Trying to connect to internet in Debian))
- From: slitt at troubleshooters.com (Steve Litt)
- [Discuss] SSH options (was Future of X11 (was Trying to connect to internet in Debian))
- From: ron at bclug.ca (Ron)
- [Discuss] SSH options (was Future of X11 (was Trying to connect to internet in Debian))
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] SSH options (was Future of X11 (was Trying to connect to internet in Debian))
- From: ron at bclug.ca (Ron)
- [Discuss] Stalwart E-mail; Was: Re: SSH options
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Stalwart E-mail; Was: Re: SSH options
- From: ron at bclug.ca (Ron)
- [Discuss] Stalwart E-mail; Was: Re: SSH options
- From: slitt at troubleshooters.com (Steve Litt)
- [Discuss] SSH options (was Future of X11 (was Trying to connect to internet in Debian))
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] MUMPS: was Stalwart E-mail; Was: Re: SSH options
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Stalwart E-mail; Was: Re: SSH options
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Stalwart E-mail; Was: Re: SSH options
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Stalwart E-mail; Was: Re: SSH options
- Index(es):
