BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- Subject: [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 14:25:30 -0400
- In-reply-to: <mFlzau6ezeaBP0gH7cGlxjM-oRrpyUc8glznQi72OZNepcPt-wIa5as8gnoeLwP9aUw6MPrmh3P8vutoMlhGvYQFdX4McXm4LKkiiX3RFoI=@cryptnet.net>
- References: <3ba75ddf-6d93-40c7-85ca-050531c8a4dd@app.fastmail.com> <121cb616-ba15-460b-8633-68b12007d2c1@borg.org> <20260411125347.7a3b1c48.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com> <aae1dbf0-dec1-46cb-b09c-82a6d0257b91@borg.org> <20260411191138.5e292aa7.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com> <cfbaecd3-841d-40d7-b7c1-b46c2200d5b7@borg.org> <20260411214838.56b593e0.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com> <mhAY9OfKywiwe5p9jbuWP4ZxR5fGgd7_uUqrqbjEws0md5d1BH7updt-DQ7IxVGAWZtMxIQEMFd_TyLwwGLDReULVRqU4GGGU_jnvKXUZOM=@cryptnet.net> <qh5h3x3w2kbe5voii3hcgo2vuapoxl7nrlvzgoug4nrsv2kr3v@mhmssfwu7rvo> <mFlzau6ezeaBP0gH7cGlxjM-oRrpyUc8glznQi72OZNepcPt-wIa5as8gnoeLwP9aUw6MPrmh3P8vutoMlhGvYQFdX4McXm4LKkiiX3RFoI=@cryptnet.net>
On Thu, 16 Apr 2026 15:59:15 +0000 "V. Alex Brennen" <vab at cryptnet.net> wrote: > Basically, it is all priced by tokens (which are about 75% of a word > for English text and a little less clear for say C Code). So, I just > ran `wc` a few different ways to try and estimate. For the stuff I > look at that was mostly crypto related code and robotics code it > seems to work out to around $350USD to $500USD mostly depending on > the size of the repo. Which is approximately one billion percent more than most open source projects have to spend. You need to be a well-funded organization -- such as Google, Black Duck, Red Hat or JFrog -- to afford to do this kind of scanning on any kind of routine basis. -- \m/ (--) \m/
- References:
- [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- From: rrose at pobox.com (Randall Rose)
- [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- From: vab at cryptnet.net (V. Alex Brennen)
- [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- From: vab at cryptnet.net (V. Alex Brennen)
- [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] printer question
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- Index(es):
