BLU Officers list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[BLU/Officers] Fix to SpamAssassin rules
- Subject: [BLU/Officers] Fix to SpamAssassin rules
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 06:54:30 -0400
- In-reply-to: <BANLkTik2C=QMzV=q24p6OrkOqLz+U5uNew@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <BANLkTik2C=QMzV=q24p6OrkOqLz+U5uNew@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/06/2011 01:50 AM, John Abreau wrote: > We've been getting a lot of false positives with the text "[SPAM]" > prepended to the subject line. > I just examined a bunch of legitimate messages that were falsely > tagged, and all the ones > I looked at had the rule "FH_DATE_PAST_20XX" as the biggest > contributor to their spam scores. > > Further research turned up a thread about this rule, which apparently > decides that any date > past 2009-12-31 is "grossly in the future" and is therefore likely to be spam. > > I added a rule to spamassassin's local.cf to change the score for > FH_DATE_PAST_20XX > to 0.0, so it won't create any more false positives. > > Since a lot of current threads have the "[SPAM]" tag fossilized into > their Subject lines, > I also changed the tag in local.cf to "[**SPAM**]", to make it easier > to track whether > we still have an issue with false positives. > > > Ok, thanks. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846
- References:
- [BLU/Officers] Fix to SpamAssassin rules
- From: jabr at blu.org (John Abreau)
- [BLU/Officers] Fix to SpamAssassin rules
- Prev by Date: [BLU/Officers] Fix to SpamAssassin rules
- Next by Date: [BLU/Officers] [SPAM] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] [SPAM] Re: New backup script
- Previous by thread: [BLU/Officers] Fix to SpamAssassin rules
- Next by thread: [BLU/Officers] Still getting a lot of false positives
- Index(es):