BLU Officers list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[BLU/Officers] BLU camcorder
- Subject: [BLU/Officers] BLU camcorder
- From: abreauj at gmail.com (John Abreau)
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 14:24:51 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAFv2jcZ9qNaGx4QF6L9QGRTV5bb5anj+S=eYCFp=W3BZor5y4Q@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAFv2jcaxX6k67euuRj1g4qRV58rB_WHdZytJxBFbHnrN5x8MfQ@mail.gmail.com> <4FD01FF9.4040005@thekramers.net> <CAFv2jcZ8-R3S3cX8RYahGsBOPc=ir64ZfFjfMmd1R-FtH0VPWQ@mail.gmail.com> <4FD0C6CD.1040303@blu.org> <CAFv2jcZ9qNaGx4QF6L9QGRTV5bb5anj+S=eYCFp=W3BZor5y4Q@mail.gmail.com>
I found a review on CNET that says it uses a low-resolution sensor, and that the unit feels flimsy. The review concludes that you can't get true HD quality for less than $500. In the Youtube comparison I found, the Sony showed a quality comparable to the Zi-8 when lighting was good, and much better quality under low-light. If we return the Sony, the next question is how much are we willing to spend on a better camcorder? Most of the models that turn up in my searches are over $1,000, and that seems a bit steep for our resources. On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:33 PM, John Abreau <abreauj at gmail.com> wrote: > It already shipped. I'll try to set up conditions similar to a BLU meeting > to test the video quality. > >> Technologically, it seems to be the worst of both worlds, because its >> sensor is SD resolution and it upconverts to HD, so you have huge files >> at low quality. > > Can you point me to these reviews? The ones I've seen were mostly positive, > with a few negative reviews that sounded like the reviewer didn't know how > to operate a camera in the first place. > > I just did another search, and I didn't find any mention of the Sony > upconverting from Standard Definition. The only mentions of SD I find > are that it records onto a Secure Digital flash card. > > I found a side-by-side comparison on Youtube of the Kodak Zi-8 vs the > Sony HDR-C110 (the model that the 210 replaced when it was released > earlier this year), and the video quality of the Sony looked every bit as > good as the Kodak, and better in a low-light test. > > > > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> wrote: >> Cancel the order if you can. >> If not, check it out when you get it, and if it does not meet with your >> expectations, return it. >> >> On 06/06/2012 11:54 PM, John Abreau wrote: >>> Sorry, I thought nobody cared to respond. I ordered it earlier today. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:28 PM, David Kramer <david at thekramers.net> wrote: >>>> On 06/04/2012 06:05 PM, John Abreau wrote: >>>>> Hi, guys. >>>>> >>>>> The Kodak Zi-8 mini camcorder is not working right. Even at its best, >>>>> it did a poor job >>>>> of recording in low-light conditions, and for the past two meetings >>>>> that I recorded >>>>> wit it, the video was extremely blurry to the point of being >>>>> completely useless. >>>>> I made several attempts to clean the lens, to no effect. >>>>> >>>>> I'm considering purchasing a new camcorder. I did a search for >>>>> low-cost HD camcorders >>>>> that work well in low-light conditions, and I found that the Sony >>>>> HDR-CX210 showed >>>>> a lot of positive reviews. Amazon is currently selling the HDR-CX210 >>>>> for $327.94, and >>>>> The balance in our checking account is currently 1,979.45, so it seems >>>>> reasonably >>>>> affordable. >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to hear your thoughts before I decide whether to go ahead and purchase >>>>> the HDR-CX210. >>>> I'm sorry I have meetings Tuesday and Thursday this week so I don't have >>>> time to do a ton of research, but a quick search turned up ?mediocre >>>> reviews calling it flimsy. >>>> >>>> Technologically, it seems to be the worst of both worlds, because its >>>> sensor is SD resolution and it upconverts to HD, so you have huge files >>>> at low quality. >>>> >>>> I'll try to do more research this weekend, if you can wait that long. >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Officers mailing list >>>> Officers at blu.org >>>> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/officers >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> >> Boston Linux and Unix >> PGP key id:3BC1EB90 >> PGP Key fingerprint: 49E2 C52A FC5A A31F 8D66 ?C0AF 7CEA 30FC 3BC1 EB90 >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Officers mailing list >> Officers at blu.org >> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/officers >> > > > > -- > John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix > OLD GnuPG KeyID: D5C7B5D9 / Email: abreauj at gmail.com > OLD GnuPG FP: 72 FB 39 4F 3C 3B D6 5B E0 C8 5A 6E F1 2C BE 99 > 2011 PGP KeyID: 32A492D8 / Email: abreauj at gmail.com > 2011 PGP FP: 7834 AEC2 EFA3 565C A4B6 ?9BA4 0ACB AD85 32A4 92D8 -- John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix OLD GnuPG KeyID: D5C7B5D9 / Email: abreauj at gmail.com OLD GnuPG FP: 72 FB 39 4F 3C 3B D6 5B E0 C8 5A 6E F1 2C BE 99 2011 PGP KeyID: 32A492D8 / Email: abreauj at gmail.com 2011 PGP FP: 7834 AEC2 EFA3 565C A4B6 ?9BA4 0ACB AD85 32A4 92D8
- References:
- [BLU/Officers] BLU camcorder
- From: abreauj at gmail.com (John Abreau)
- [BLU/Officers] BLU camcorder
- From: david at thekramers.net (David Kramer)
- [BLU/Officers] BLU camcorder
- From: abreauj at gmail.com (John Abreau)
- [BLU/Officers] BLU camcorder
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- [BLU/Officers] BLU camcorder
- From: abreauj at gmail.com (John Abreau)
- [BLU/Officers] BLU camcorder
- Prev by Date: [BLU/Officers] BLU camcorder
- Next by Date: [BLU/Officers] I have pneumonia
- Previous by thread: [BLU/Officers] BLU camcorder
- Next by thread: [BLU/Officers] Next InstallFest?
- Index(es):