MediaOne/RR/AT&T cablemodemers alert

[John Abreau]

David Kramer <david at thekramers.net> writes;

> They just changed name server IP's.  Had me going crazy why I could find
> things from my server (which got the new numbers through DHCP), but my
> Windows box couldn't (which has the numbers hard-coded, and a rebood to
> change them).
> 
> I should probably set up a cacheing-only name server on my linux box to
> solve this problem.  Sounds like a medium-sized project I don't have the
> time or knowledge for right now though.

They changed it with no notice to the customer base? That's pretty lame.
I'd certainly recommend running DNS internally. 

I haven't looked at how caching-only servers are defined in the various 
linux distributions. If it's actually a complete DNS server that just 
happens
to not be serving any zones, then I'd agree it's a good option. If it's 
implemented as something that merely passes requests on to the ISP's DNS 
server if the request isn't already cached, then I'd suggest running the 
complete server.


--
John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix 
ICQ 28611923 / AIM abreauj / JABBER jabr at jabber.org / YAHOO abreauj
Email jabr at blu.org / WWW http://www.blu.org




--
John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix 
ICQ 28611923 / AIM abreauj / JABBER jabr at jabber.org / YAHOO abreauj
Email jabr at blu.org / WWW http://www.blu.org


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1778 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20011003/b8457c19/attachment.sig>