MediaOne/RR/AT&T cablemodemers alert
Jerry Feldman
gaf at blu.org
Wed Oct 3 07:00:14 EDT 2001
24.128.60.8 and 24.128.60.7 still work, so what's the real problem. I just
tested 24.128.60.8 and it appears to be working fine.
John Abreau wrote:
> --==_Exmh_-1206541484P
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> David Kramer <david at thekramers.net> writes;
>
> > They just changed name server IP's. Had me going crazy why I could find
> > things from my server (which got the new numbers through DHCP), but my
> > Windows box couldn't (which has the numbers hard-coded, and a rebood to
> > change them).
> >
> > I should probably set up a cacheing-only name server on my linux box to
> > solve this problem. Sounds like a medium-sized project I don't have the
> > time or knowledge for right now though.
>
> They changed it with no notice to the customer base? That's pretty lame.
> I'd certainly recommend running DNS internally.
>
> I haven't looked at how caching-only servers are defined in the various
> linux distributions. If it's actually a complete DNS server that just
> happens
> to not be serving any zones, then I'd agree it's a good option. If it's
> implemented as something that merely passes requests on to the ISP's DNS
> server if the request isn't already cached, then I'd suggest running the
> complete server.
>
>
> --
> John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix
> ICQ 28611923 / AIM abreauj / JABBER jabr at jabber.org / YAHOO abreauj
> Email jabr at blu.org / WWW http://www.blu.org
>
>
>
>
> --
> John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix
> ICQ 28611923 / AIM abreauj / JABBER jabr at jabber.org / YAHOO abreauj
> Email jabr at blu.org / WWW http://www.blu.org
>
>
>
> --==_Exmh_-1206541484P
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> David Kramer <david at thekramers.net> writes;
>
> > They just changed name server IP's. Had me going crazy why I could find
> > things from my server (which got the new numbers through DHCP), but my
> > Windows box couldn't (which has the numbers hard-coded, and a rebood to
> > change them).
> >
> > I should probably set up a cacheing-only name server on my linux box to
> > solve this problem. Sounds like a medium-sized project I don't have the
> > time or knowledge for right now though.
>
> They changed it with no notice to the customer base? That's pretty lame.
> I'd certainly recommend running DNS internally.
>
> I haven't looked at how caching-only servers are defined in the various
> linux distributions. If it's actually a complete DNS server that just
> happens
> to not be serving any zones, then I'd agree it's a good option. If it's
> implemented as something that merely passes requests on to the ISP's DNS
> server if the request isn't already cached, then I'd suggest running the
> complete server.
>
>
> - --
> John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix
> ICQ 28611923 / AIM abreauj / JABBER jabr at jabber.org / YAHOO abreauj
> Email jabr at blu.org / WWW http://www.blu.org
>
>
>
>
> - --
> John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix
> ICQ 28611923 / AIM abreauj / JABBER jabr at jabber.org / YAHOO abreauj
> Email jabr at blu.org / WWW http://www.blu.org
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000
>
> iQCVAwUBO7qZJFV9A5rVx7XZAQLd4QP+I6LkrGbDFVlfbIGwcLozqG+uYRhqdNHQ
> R30tdk8V0QuuPDLx6VJUpSGgJ2GrL7y8SebZSCWSCCuihFbOfAwPlyikzg/+vHvE
> bfnPYXJw1ViaQHagPbwTHEL2T2Yr9bThEov2mNOEO+ziVeGmRmbA/lRRQ04Ueokk
> OI5R6NPijt0=
> =aXUY
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --==_Exmh_-1206541484P--
> -
> Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
> "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
> message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
>
--
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org
-
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
More information about the Discuss
mailing list