Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Wed, 21 Apr, Jerry Callen rhetorically asked: >How do I get the version number of perl? Of emacs? Of the Linux kernel? I think in general when you have a question, you look at the man pages. That is a consistent approach, and, for example, that's usually how you determine how to determine the version number. In addition, things like this usually have only some small set of possibilities. For instance, I might try 'perl -v', 'perl -V', 'perl --version', 'perl -version'. (But then, try 'od -v', and it'll just sit there waiting for input. I know what you're saying.) >Sure, there are simple ways to get this information, but they differ from >tool to tool, and you have to know them. Windoze has one consistent >mechanism (at least for this...). Windows is also developed by one entity, and you pay for it; they have incentive to provide a uniform interface. Linux is developed by whoever feels like developing something. Then, you might say, why don't the distributors develop a more uniform interface, because they make money from it. I think RPM goes somewhat toward that, and also GNU things tend to be uniform, but then you have these several different development efforts trying to be uniform in different ways. I suppose they'll each fill a certain niche, or they'll just fizzle into oblivion. What's that called--a complex adaptive system? Just like we're stuck with QWERTY and VHS, we're stuck with differing interfaces. >I'm not a Unix hater. I wouldn't be hanging out with a bunch of other >[studmuffins] on the BLU list if I were! :-) My sole point is that this >is one of the things that Unix gets dinged for by people with an >anti-Unix agenda: every tool works differently. I do see what you're saying, but I don't see how to resolve the problem without introducing Windowsesque side-effects. Personally, I like that every tool works differently (to a certain extent), as it gives them different character. Eck, who wants boring uniformity anyway? I dunno; I suppose it depends on your goals. If you want to maximize productivity, maybe uniformity is essential. - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |