![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, David Kramer wrote: > I don't have the original email you sent, but based on the message Scott > sent, it looks like the issue is not that you sent two copies (many people > do that. I think the return address SHOULD be the list but lots of > members disagree, including those making the decision). This makes replying privately to the sender rather a pain in the *$$. It's just a bad idea, and there are lots of good arguments against doing it, and few (but admittedly some) good arguments for doing it. Plus the point was that there are two copies of the message IN THE SAME MESSAGE. So if you count what you're talking about, you get FOUR copies of the message, not two. It's very easy to configure procmail to filter out duplicate messages... it's specifically mentioned in the man pages. -- Derek Martin System Administrator Mission Critical Linux martin at MissionCriticalLinux.com - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |