Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Ron Peterson wrote: > > I'm curious. Does Apache cache static web content in memory? I.E. - if > I request a static page, does Apache store that page in memory for some > period of time, in case someone else asks for it? Or does Apache fetch > the page from disk each and every time? If it is cached, then for how > long? Is there a cache timeout parameter? I believe that Apache simply fetches the file from disk each time. Of course, the underlying operating system is likely to cache the file. It's not clear that adding a cache to Apache would be better than letting the OS handle it; the likely result would be to have Apache cache too little (slowing it down) or too much (slowing other applications down). > Taking this a step further, would PHP perhaps do the same thing? > Obviously dynamic content, like database data, would need to be > requeried, but the php files themselves could be loaded every "x" number > of minutes or something. I know that mod_perl caches loaded code, so that it doesn't have to reload and recompile it. That's a much more expensive operation than simply fetching a file from disk, so an internal cache is the right thing here. I don't know what PHP does. This, of course, can be awkward in a development environment - your code changes don't take effect right away. I suppose the solution is not to run your in-development scripts under mod_perl unless you have to (if they're depending on looking at some Apache internals, for example). - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |