Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
> I saw something I missed earlier - its in this thread somewhere.... It > says that Linux has very little official oversight - although I have never > contributed code to the kernel I have heard that is not the case. I have > heard the maintainer will readily not accept code that isn't up to par. ... > Did I miss something somewhere? Perhaps. Perhaps it is a matter of perspective. By 'Official Oversight', I assumed the author meant oversight by someone in authority outside of the coding group, such as a non-technical manager/boss, or some standards setting agency. Perhaps it was something particular to that environment, but when I was a technical consultant in DuPont, official oversight meant outside influence, that we would be judged by someone who was not one of us. Since I was in the Division of Commercial Explosives, this meant that the ATF, DoT, DoE, DoI BoM, OSHA, MSHA, and on rare occasion, the DoD held that role. Hunter
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |