Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Linus has always maintained control over the kernel. There are pros and cons to both approaches. "Anthony J. Gabrielson" wrote: > I saw something I missed earlier - its in this thread somewhere.... It > says that Linux has very little offical oversight - although I have never > contributed code to the kernel I have heard that is not the case. I have > heard the maintainer will readly not accept code that isn't up to par. It > seems to me that a project like this couldn't survive without a person at > the top. So their are maintainers of sections (i.e net, scsi, ppc, > etc..) and then a maintainer of the entire project. From what I can see > their is alot of oversight from a few people and many people are sending > them code. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |