Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Ransom Love (CEO of Caldera) was interviewed on Slashdot today about UnitedLinux. Among other questions, he was asked whether UnitedLinux binaries would be freely available. He said no (entire response quoted below). If he's talking about CD images, then they might be able to claim a compilation copyright. Certainly they can restrict copying on bits that they wrote themselves. If he's talking about individual GPLed packages though, I think there may be a legal problem here. The issue is whether the following clause from the GPL applies to binaries based on GPLed sources. It would seem that way to me, but IANAL... > 6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the >Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from the >original licensor to copy, distribute or modify the Program subject to >these terms and conditions. You may not impose any further >restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights granted herein. >You are not responsible for enforcing compliance by third parties to >this License. Bill Bogstad bogstad at pobox.com http://interviews.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/06/24/1556244&mode=nocomment&tid=163 3) Source and binary distributions by RGRistroph There has been some confusion on your statement in the UL teleconference to the effect that while source code would be available to meet the requirements of the GPL, "binaries would not be freely available." Could you clarify what that means? Is it possible that UL will distribute only source, or only distribute source and binaries to it's member companies? (Who will then be responsible for making sure they meet the license requirements on software which is in their distributions?) Surely UL or it's members don't intend to distribute binaries compiled from GPL code and assert the recipient can't re-distribute them? Ransom: The binaries that are certified by the major ISVs and OEMs will not be made freely available for distribution by anyone. This is to limit the support liability for these companies and to ensure a high quality, consistent product around the world for support purposes. The UnitedLinux product produced is not just a binary, but 12-months of maintenance. That maintenance is for a single system and therefore has limited distribution. The source code for the server will be made freely available for all in compliance with all of the Open Source licenses. There will be programs for developers who need access to the binaries and they will include options for ongoing updates and patches to ensure continued certification compliance. Our desire is to make UnitedLinux easily available for serious developers, and give them means to make the development process easier.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |