Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 20 September 2003 23:09, Cole Tuininga wrote: > I have a coworker who has been playing with gentoo as of late. He likes > the fact that the software has a tendency to be cutting/bleeding edge, > and he likes to feel as though he's getting more speed out of everything > because it's compiled specifically for his setup. Truth be told none of > us can really see a difference. I've been running Gentoo for a year or so now; I am definately not in it for the bleeding-edge code. The portage system works great for me; I've only had some minor quibbles with it. The advantage, I'd say, isn't so much the mega-optimized system as it is the ease of management -- config files never get overwritten and dependency management is excellent (but not perfect). There is, however, one drawback: due to the build-from-scratch process, initial setup time for a Gentoo box can be gargantuan in comparison with other distros, although optional pre-compiled binaries available in varying stages allow you to skip the laborious base system build. Best, d. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/bTe8sIjNiQTGkXARAqLYAJ9Z73yeef5yFxEnJ1tOdQYO11GicACdG49f 0//GbshI+gBlv1JVpG4mMpM= =nDFu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |