more sco

[drew at drewtaylor.com (Drew Taylor)]

Chris Devers wrote:

> On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, David J. C. Beach wrote:
> 
> 
>>On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 16:04, Chris Devers wrote:
>>
>>><facetious>
>>>
>>>Would anyone feel badly -- or notice! -- if we just, like, got rid of
>>>Utah? Wouldn't that take care of the issue?
>>>
>>>As they say, "nuke the site from orbit -- it's the only way to be sure."
>>>
>>>It's really an elegant solution if you think about it...
>>>
>>></facetious>
>>
>>Yes, but it's just not personal enough.  I'm really not sure that
>>watching Utah go up in a mushroom cloud will satiate my violent
>>fanticies about the ultimate demise of SCO.
> 
> 
> Okay, that's fine, but aside from the vague sense of personal
> dissatisfaction, you can see that it would actually take care
> of the problem nicely, right?
> 
> I mean, making it personally is nice and all, but if this takes
> care of it then it's worth doing. What's the collateral going to
> be, a bunch of SUVs & Dick Cheney's ranch? No loss there, right?

Well, I have friends in UT so I'd miss them. And the rest of the US 
would miss the skiing. The rockies in UT and CO have the best snow in 
the country IMHO. Oh, and we'd lose the Sundance Film Festival. No big 
loss there. :-)

Drew