![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 12:29:46AM +0900, Derek Martin wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 11:08:30AM -0400, Matthew Valites wrote: > > It seems to me that having a 1TB partition may not be the smartest > > setup. Ever consider how long that would take to fsck? > > It doesn't matter, if you need it. :) If you need a terabyte of storage: case 1: data is important. You use a RAID system with spare hot-swap disks, and run backups to an off-site location regularly. (Production systems, vital resources) case 2: data is unimportant. You use JBOD or simple RAID-striping without redundancy for speed, and you do a mkfs and reload the data if you run into any problems. (Data analysis, video editing, DVD/CD servers) case 3: data is semi-important. You don't use a 1 TB partition; you make many smaller partitions and the occasional fsck doesn't take too long. Backups are well-advised. -dsr-
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |