![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Just to clear things up, ya, its valuable data, its medical records for lots of people. Its definately RAID5, and we are doing proper backups. Just to satisfy the curiosity of the hardware, its a Dual Operton 240 (1.4ghz), 4GIG ram, 1.6TB of space, across 8 drives using a SATA RAID controller (3ware), running Fedora Core 2 T3 (upgraded to release). I am running the AMD 64 version of fedora. The only problem I had with this system with Fedora was the 1TB partition size barrier, which the devels all know about and blame on parted. -miah On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 03:45:06PM +0000, dsr at tao.merseine.nu wrote: > If you need a terabyte of storage: > > case 1: data is important. You use a RAID system with spare hot-swap > disks, and run backups to an off-site location regularly. (Production > systems, vital resources) > > case 2: data is unimportant. You use JBOD or simple RAID-striping without > redundancy for speed, and you do a mkfs and reload the data if you run > into any problems. (Data analysis, video editing, DVD/CD servers) > > case 3: data is semi-important. You don't use a 1 TB partition; you make > many smaller partitions and the occasional fsck doesn't take too > long. Backups are well-advised. > > -dsr- > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |