Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 03:45:06PM +0000, dsr at tao.merseine.nu wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 12:29:46AM +0900, Derek Martin wrote: > > On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 11:08:30AM -0400, Matthew Valites wrote: > > > It seems to me that having a 1TB partition may not be the smartest > > > setup. Ever consider how long that would take to fsck? > > > > It doesn't matter, if you need it. :) > > If you need a terabyte of storage: > > case 1: data is important. You use a RAID system with spare hot-swap > disks, and run backups to an off-site location regularly. (Production > systems, vital resources) Indeed. But this doesn't affect the length of time the FS will require to complete an fsck... If the filesystem is not unmounted cleanly (as will happen sometimes if the system crashes for whatever reason), it will be marked dirty and the OS will automatically fsck it on the next boot. As long as this takes, it will probably not be longer than restoring the whole thing from archives... -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thank the spammers. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20040520/9471c910/attachment.sig>
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |