Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 02:56:06PM -0400, Don Levey wrote: > Well, I have. Note that he said "exclusive of help-desk activities". Yeah I guess that's true, but it depends on what constitute help-desk activities in your organization, or if there is even a distinction between the help desk and the sysadmin team. I think making such a qualification is meaningless because it can't hold up for many, if not most organizations for those reasons. > Keeping Windows up-to-date can be accomplished by a number of > things, including their auto-update feature, SMS, and even remote > desktop. All of which users can and will break, given sufficient motivation and/or opportunity. > > I have re-implemented, or been involved in environments that > > re-implemented something very similar to what Derek describes on more > > than one occasion. And I never lived at MIT. Doing so, in as much as > > is possible at your site, makes everything a lot nicer. > It may be - but there's only been one unnamed) example mentioned so far. > Considering the number of production environments out there, this does not > seem to move it beyond the "special case" category. If you're mentioning > others, then that might change. Requiring that they be named is a bogus requirement, since without going into those environments and examining their configurations, they're not really verifiable anyway. All of the environments I worked at were engineered this way, to differing degrees. I'm not inclined to name them though, mainly because I think that discussing the details of any of their implementations is a violation of their trust, possibly of their security, and in some cases maybe even my employment agreement with those parties. But there were 4 of them, 2 of which were very large companies, and 2 of which were relatively small engineering shops. If you find that unacceptable as anecdotal evidence to the contrary, then you're welcome to continue to believe the original supposition... I don't really care. ;-) -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thank the spammers. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20040602/8c946c8f/attachment.sig>
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |