Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Kristian Hermansen wrote: > However, supported packages by Ubuntu is definitely far greater than say > RHEL. Here is Ubuntu Feisty versus CentOS 4.4. Something else I would like to point out is that Ubuntu vs. RHEL/CentOS is apples and oranges. Fedora vs. Ubuntu vs. OpenSuse is a much fairer comparison, in that they have release cycles that are similar (~6 months), and have target audiences that are similar (desktop/end-users and developers who like to tinker with servers; latest and greatest versions of everything). RHEL vs. Debian-stable vs. Suse Enterprise, in terms of release-cycle and target audience (long-running production servers; environments where stability is paramount), would seem to be a good comparison as well. Matt -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |