Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Hi Tom, Contract I have is 20m down 5m up...I am pretty consistently there with my torrents, although I think they are shaping my upstream FTP traffic on 21. More then you will ever want to know about jitter in relation to VOIP: "Jitter is a variation in packet transit delay caused by queuing, contention and serialization effects on the path through the network." http://www.voiptroubleshooter.com/indepth/jittersources.html --Ted On 4/13/07, Tom Metro <blu at vl.com> wrote: > > Ted Manka wrote: > > I have FIOS now with VOIP sunrocket...I have noticed some issues with > latency. > > Running a VOIP diagnostic my up and downstreams were high as per the > spec of > > the contract with FIOS... > > What does the contract specify? > > > > ...but the jitter was in the trash can. > > With jitter being the variance in latency from packet to packet? > > > > Also below are some ping times to some of the local universities VIA > FIOS. > > It would be interesting to see some ping times from other providers > > (Comcast, Verizon DSL, RCN etc) > > > > --- mit.edu ping statistics --- > > 11 packets transmitted, 11 packets received, 0% packet loss > > round-trip min/avg/max = 17.3/19.5/20.8 ms > > > > --- bu.edu ping statistics --- > > 10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss > > round-trip min/avg/max = 16.4/17.3/17.6 ms > > > > --- hno-webprod.harvard.edu ping statistics --- > > 11 packets transmitted, 11 packets received, 0% packet loss > > round-trip min/avg/max = 20.0/20.2/20.4 ms > > > > --- brandies.edu ping statistics --- > > 12 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 16% packet loss > > round-trip min/avg/max = 15.8/17.6/20.9 ms > > > > --- neu.edu ping statistics --- > > 10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss > > round-trip min/avg/max = 13.7/14.0/15.8 ms > > Here's what I see on a Covad DSL link: > > lex:~# foreach host (mit.edu bu.edu www.harvard.edu brandies.edu neu.edu > www.cnet.com www.google.com) > foreach? ping -qc 5 $host > foreach? end > PING mit.edu (18.7.22.69): 56 data bytes > > --- mit.edu ping statistics --- > 5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max = 34.0/34.9/36.2 ms > PING bu.edu (128.197.27.7): 56 data bytes > > --- bu.edu ping statistics --- > 5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max = 33.3/34.3/35.5 ms > PING hno-webprod.harvard.edu (128.103.60.28): 56 data bytes > > --- hno-webprod.harvard.edu ping statistics --- > 5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max = 34.1/34.7/35.8 ms > PING brandies.edu (129.64.99.169): 56 data bytes > > --- brandies.edu ping statistics --- > 5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max = 36.5/40.9/51.3 ms > PING neu.edu (155.33.227.140): 56 data bytes > > --- neu.edu ping statistics --- > 5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max = 24.0/24.7/25.2 ms > PING c18-ssa-xw-lb.cnet.com (216.239.122.220): 56 data bytes > > --- c18-ssa-xw-lb.cnet.com ping statistics --- > 5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max = 69.3/70.2/72.0 ms > PING www.l.google.com (216.239.37.99): 56 data bytes > > --- www.l.google.com ping statistics --- > 5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max = 34.2/35.3/36.7 ms > > > Average seems to be around 35 ms. > > > > Great post about verizon and FIOS. > > Thanks. > > -Tom > > -- > Tom Metro > Venture Logic, Newton, MA, USA > "Enterprise solutions through open source." > Professional Profile: http://tmetro.venturelogic.com/ > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |