BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Relevance of PGP?

Subject: Relevance of PGP?
From: richard.pieri-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org (Richard Pieri)
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:02:30 -0400
In-reply-to: <4DF2804E.3070405-FJ05HQ0HCKaWd6l5hS35sQ@public.gmane.org>
References: <BANLkTi=rH1vLCPpgO+cjCrt21XAsuUfe5Q@mail.gmail.com> <000401cc2767$b41595d0$1c40c170$@nedharvey.com> <4DF249DF.1040002@vl.com> <4DF24EE6.8030801@mohawksoft.com> <1B71198A-5203-4139-AED9-41650010C10D@gmail.com> <4DF262F0.9040200@mohawksoft.com> <4DF27C62.5040800@vl.com> <4DF2804E.3070405@mohawksoft.com>

On Jun 10, 2011, at 4:36 PM, Mark Woodward wrote:
> 
> Actually, yes.  I use OTR myself. The connection piece, of course, needs 
> to propagate the key from the IM to email and web browser.

Oh, wait.  By "private" you mean "anonymous"?

--Rich P.

References:
- [Discuss] Relevance of PGP?
  - From: jabr at blu.org (John Abreau)
- Relevance of PGP?
  - From: blu-Z8efaSeK1ezqlBn2x/YWAg at public.gmane.org (Edward Ned Harvey)
- Relevance of PGP?
  - From: tmetro-blu-5a1Jt6qxUNc at public.gmane.org (Tom Metro)
- Relevance of PGP?
  - From: markw-FJ05HQ0HCKaWd6l5hS35sQ at public.gmane.org (Mark Woodward)
- Relevance of PGP?
  - From: richard.pieri-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org (Richard Pieri)
- Relevance of PGP?
  - From: markw-FJ05HQ0HCKaWd6l5hS35sQ at public.gmane.org (Mark Woodward)
- Relevance of PGP?
  - From: tmetro-blu-5a1Jt6qxUNc at public.gmane.org (Tom Metro)
- Relevance of PGP?
  - From: markw-FJ05HQ0HCKaWd6l5hS35sQ at public.gmane.org (Mark Woodward)

Prev by Date: Relevance of PGP?
Next by Date: Relevance of PGP?
Previous by thread: Relevance of PGP?
Next by thread: Relevance of PGP?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org